UNFAITHFUL
(Adrian Lyne, 2002) R
Reviewed: May 14, 2002
Lyne's on his home turf (adultery and strained sexual liaisons) and he knows the
terrain well. Surprisingly excellent, much better than Fatal Attraction
and thankfully never interested in cheap eroticism, Unfaithful earns
its sex and violence via skillful patience. This is an ultra simple premise (wife
cheats on husband with foreign heartthrob; complications ensure), but Lyne and
his writers have the self-control to take the premise where it logically wants
to go. Never in a hurry, never forced, never boring, Unfaithful immediately sets
itself far apart from the big studio packs who rush their plot developments at
warp speed into contrivance hell. Diane Lane's stunning; no sobbing arguments
or emotional explosions, but a lot of facial acting, flipping feelings around
with a slight expression or an offhand remark. Richard Gere's husband is not carved
from easy ol' uncaring, dispassionate jackass mold -- he's just an average, decent
guy with some bad luck and bad timing -- and Gere's flawless in the role, selling
a pent up, careless aggression with the proper restraint. Unfaithful is harder
than most films; we don't know exactly why Lane wants to cheat on Gere, and wisely
left without reductionist explanations, we're maturely asked/allowed to sense
the myriad unspoken possibilities ourselves. The movie, to its vast credit, doesn't
try and insinuate Lane's affair is, at its core, about more than sex (clearly
the foreign heartthrob is essentially an exotic dildo), though Lane's cheating
mind set is anything but banal.
Unfaithful looks wonderfully lush, depicting upper-class, suburban oppression
with the right doss of hazy gloss. Lyne makes nice exaggerated use of close-ups,
can shoot disorientation as powerfully as any director working and has a sublime
sense of juxtaposition (or mainly his legendary, enormously versatile editor,
Anne V. Coates, does; she's 77 years old and has cut everything from Lawrence
of Arabia to Murder on the Orient Express to The Elephant Man
to What About Bob? to In the Line of Fire to Out of Sight).
Unfaithful's editing highlights include: Lane's flashbacks on the train home;
heartthrob making coffee intercut with Lane in his bathroom; Lane's train platform
dissolve; the jarring cut with Lane suddenly appearing at heartthrob's doorway.
Lyne and Coates have faith in their visuals and there's no reliance on expository
crap.
Unfaithful dramatically switches gears in its third act. Some critics were unwilling
to follow the film to these places as they think a device that will go unnamed
is cheap and unrealistic and, unimaginative bores they are, would I guess
liked to have seen the film play out in the same exact (by this point repetitive)
vein as it began. Horseshit, I counter. The filmmakers had the audacity to follow
through with their convictions, the courage to go exactly where their premise
took them. This is not an outta left-field convolution; the final act of Unfaithful,
exciting and taut, is most definitely in keeping with the rest of the film tonally.
Most importantly the device allows for the thus far best, most beautifully vague
ending of the year (Lane's car speech to Gere and the final shot are poetically
perfect).
Return home.