ALONG CAME A SPIDER
(Lee Tamahori, 2001)
Reviewed: April 8th, 2002
Intro A: A friend of my mine told me he started a Morgan Freeman fan club
in high school. It's hard to imagine anyone not wanting to join.
____________
Intro B: I have decided to review this film in two parts. Along Came
a Spider: Part I will entail the first hour and twenty minutes of this movie
and Along Came a Spider: Part II will involve the last twenty two minutes.
As far I'm concerned they're two entirely separate pieces of work, sharing no
common denominator aside besides Morgan Freeman at his finest and a kickass score
by the immortal Jerry Goldsmith (Planet of the Apes, Patton, Chinatown,
L.A. Confidential).
____________
Intro C: Big-ass fan of Kiss the Girls that I am, I entered Along
Came a Spider with tempered excitement. On one hand, I knew Freeman returning
to the character of Detective Alex Cross, a role he was born to play, would
be like Jordan returning to the NBA. On the other hand, I was skeptical if lightening
could strike twice in James Patterson land. Only a fool's not skeptical of a man
who names all his novels after frickin' nursery rhymes. I thought Kiss the Girls:
the film might have been largely dumb luck. (Plus I was very worried viz. the
choice of Monica "Patch Head Over Heels Adams" Potter
as Freeman's lead costar in Along Came a Spider. Let's just say her work in Con
Air didn't overwhelm me.)
And surely enough, my Potter fears were justified. While not a bad actress per
se, casting her opposite Freeman--an actor of enormous weight and gravity and
presence who barrels over those actors well beneath his skill--is a huge miscalculation.
Did they not have the funds to cast anyone stronger? Freeman's a giant and Kiss
the Girls' success is largely predicated on star Ashley Judd, an actress talented
enough to hold her own opposite him. The chasm between a Judd and a Potter is
gaping.
____________
PART I
Independent of Potter qualms, I was pleasantly surprised by how much Along Came
a Spider: Part I gets right. Save a prologue so clichéd and perfunctory
it'll make even a slightly seasoned audience member groan (think Cliffhanger
and about, uh, a million other movies), there's a lot of strong material here.
While nothing about Along Came a Spider is particularly original, the way it steals
from different films and combines them into some kind of Frankensteinian monster
releases at least an aroma of freshness. Equally influenced by Se7en, Copycat
and Die Hard With a Vengeance, Along Came a Spider is wise enough to steal
from the best (there's even a great line in the film directly ripped off from
Michael Mann's masterpiece Heat; I couldn't help but smile/gotta at least
applaud the audacity). When Spider's villain sends Freeman an anonymous brown
box, you're half certain you know the contents. Then later, Freeman says about
the villain: "He's been at this for years. Imagine the dedication... the
patience." Freeman said almost the same exact line re: John Doe in Se7en.
Ironically, I recall an interview with director Lee Tamahori (Once Were Warriors,
The Edge) in which he discussed about how much influence David Fincher
has had on the aesthetics of the thriller genre. Tamahori talked about how, nowadays,
everyone tries to shoot thrillers as these dark, richly atmospheric, almost surreal
works, because of Fincher. Tamahori, however, then declared his intention was
to go the opposite route with Spider. Do something different for a change. Don't
try and ape the inimitable Fincher. I wasn't sure if I knew exactly what he meant
or I thought his decisions were necessarily wise ones, but now that I've seen
Along Came a Spider: Part I, I get it. Tamahori's imbued Part I with a wonderful,
almost anachronistic, cleanliness. There's a few scenes set in the rain
at night, but that's as 'serial killer moody' as Spider becomes. Nothing feels
overdone. No real fancy shots, just a simplicity and a concentration on pushing
the storytelling itself (likewise, I can't wait to see what Tamahori does with
his next project, i.e. the newest James Bond film).
Tamahori also has a crucial willingness to let scenes gingerly unfold at the speed
they require. Pacing's obviously one of the most important facets of the thriller
genre, easily making or breaking many a film. In the past few years, thanks, of
course, to MTV, commercials, and despicable filmmakers like Guy Ritchie, Simon
West and Dominic Sena, movies seem--with alarming frequency--too chaotically fast
and haphazard. Luckily Tamahori knows just when to slow things down a bit, when
to give things a chance to develop and breath, while still bearing in mind when
to amp-up.
Perhaps most pleasantly surprising about Part I, Tamahori has the courage to never
give the audience too much information. The film frequently seems one step ahead
of us, and it's fun. Most of the time I had no idea where Along Came a Spider:
Part I was headed. I didn't know the villain's motivations. I didn't know how
certain conflicts would play out. And I was genuinely surprised by a few of the
twists. Plus, as a kind of compensation for Monica Potter's shortcomings, Part
I's got very notable supporting turns from (a personal favorite of mine since
ABC's great TV series Murder One) Dylan Baker and Michael Wincott (think
Michael Rooker's even more demented brother), whose haunting voice
makes him ideal as the aforementioned villain.
____________
PART II
A total disaster, so monumentally ill-conceived, so poorly written (and sometimes
even directed), that it's astounding this garbage made it to the big screen courtesy
of (allegedly) the same people who brought us something as accomplished as Along
Came a Spider: Part I.
I had heard rumors Spider (at this point, it would technically be Along Came a
Spider: Alpha Cut) was struggling with its ending, having to resort to reshoots
(never a good sign). Judging from Part II, it sure as hell looks like the grapevine
was accurate. What kills me is how no one involved with Along Came a Spider: Part
I knew better. Even if, for some inexplicable reason, the studio wanted this ending
and thus hired a hack rewriter to maim Marc Moss's otherwise crisp dialogue, couldn't
Freeman have stood up? Or Tamahori? Or Potter? Or Goldsmith ("Hell no, I
won't score!, Hell no, I won't score!") Or the grips, gaffers, teamsters
and everyone else, all banded together, united as a front? Just who the hell could
have thought any of this Part II shit was a good idea? And if this is the original
ending of the novel (which somehow I doubt) Patterson should retire.
Along Came a Spider: Part II is totally unbelievable, does a monumental disservice
to everything that's come before it, and is yet another footnote in my eventually-to-be-written
dissertation on how Virtually No One Has Any Idea How To End A Film, proper.
I would advise reediting Along Came a Spider yourself. Watch the first hour and
twenty minutes, then just bring the damn disc back to the video store.
Return home.